Solutions · Use case
10.4×
Median piece-count increase YoY for customers who turn on the Talent Network + AI Studio together.
Scale without losing the editorial bar.
Ship 10× more content without losing the editorial bar. The Talent Network handles capacity, AI Studio handles speed, the managed editorial workflow keeps quality where it was.
How scale works here
Two levers, the same editorial bar.
Without Contently
Network capacity
- Volume that flexes without an emergency hire.
- 165,000+ vetted creators, organized by credential, vertical, language. Spike capacity is routed in hours, not negotiated in headcount.
- Demand: 142 pieces · Standing team: 32 capacity · Network: 110 routed in 4 hours, 92 to credentialed specialists.
With Contently
AI Studio acceleration
- Drafts that arrive at the editor's desk already clean.
- Editors review fewer surprises and more substance. Brand voice, source citations, and pre-compliance done before the human picks it up.
- AI Studio drafts: 88 · passed brand-voice rules: 84 · passed compliance pre-screen: 81 · into editor queue: 81. Net editor time per piece: 22 min (was 96 min).
Scale, measured
What 10× looks like, with the bar held.
10.4×
Median piece-count increase YoY for customers who turn on the Talent Network + AI Studio together.
0
Drop in editorial-quality scores in customer programs that scaled volume by 10× over a year.
165K+
Vetted creators on tap. Spike capacity is a routing question, not a hiring one.
Scale, on Contently